Modernity on Endless Trial

by Leszek Kołakowski

Book Overview

Leszek Kolakowski delves into some of the most intellectually vigorous questions of our time in this remarkable collection of essays garnished with his characteristic wit. Ten of the essays have never appeared before in English.

"Exemplary. . . . It should be celebrated." --Arthur C. Danto, New York Times Book Review

"This book . . . express es] Kolakowski's thought on God, man, reason, history, moral truth and original sin, prompted...

• Format: Hardcover
• Language: English
• ISBN: 0226450457
• ISBN13: 9780226450452
• Release Date: March 1991
• Publisher: University of Chicago Press
• Length: 267 Pages
• Weight: 1.14 lbs.
• Dimensions: 1.0" x 6.3" x 9.2"

Customer Reviews

Excellent introduction

This wide ranging collection of essays is an introduction to a major XXth century thinker. Utterly lucid, he draws on philosophy, theology, and a deep knowledge of modern history to trace the seeds of "modernity" and their fruits, good and bad. His encyclopedic knowledge of both Christian thought and Marxism gives him a unique position to examine both how we got to where we are and to see the flaws in most unexamined assumptions. Unfortunately, they broke the mold. Will we ever see his like again? He must be talking to Isaiah Berlin in the Elysian Fields and I'd love to overhear it.

Superb short essays

I've followed Kolakowski's writings since the 1970s. He brings the cold-eyed East European perspective to the political, diplomatic, ideological and social struggles of the 20th century.

meditations on the struggle between tradition and progress

Twenty-four essays by philosopher Leszek Kolakowksi ( Univ of Chicago / Oxford ) comprise the totality of "MODERNITY ON ENDLESS TRIAL", a volume divided into 4 parts:I. "On Modernity, Barbarity and Intellectuals"II. "On the Dilemmas of the Christian Legacy"III. "On Liberals, Revolutionaries and Utopians"IV. "On Scientific Theories"The book in its entirety is an examination of the ceaseless argumentation among opposing ideas that has propelled and sustained that part of Western Tradition expressed in "the pluralist society". In his brief forward he submits his essays as- "semi-philosophical sermons in which...to point out a number of unpleasant and insoluble dilemmas that loom up every time we attempt to be perfectly consistent when we think about our culture, our politics and our religious life...these essays are not edifying. They are rather appeals for moderation in consistency..."True to form, Kolakowksi consistently refuses the knifepoint threat of "either/or" ultimatums, exploring the mutually antagonistic yet symbiotic struggle between tradition and progress. Select quotations from his essays will not do the author justice but may perhaps give some evidence of his train of thought:"It would be silly, of course, to be either `for' or `against' modernity tout court, not only because it is pointless to try to stop the development of technology, science and economic rationality, but because both modernity and antimodernity may be expressed in barbarous and antihuman terms". ( MODERNITY ON ENDLESS TRIAL ) "Ultimately we may say the Europe's cultural identity is reinforced by her refusal to accept any kind of closed, finite definition and thus she can only affirm her identity in uncertainty and anxiety... The choice between total perfection and total self-destruction is not ours; cares without end, incompleteness without end, these are our lot. Thus, in the doubt which Europe entertains about herself, European culture can find its spiritual equilibrium and the justification for its pretensions to universality" ( LOOKING FOR THE BARBARIANS )"It is difficult to protect democracy by democratic means; difficult, but feasible on condition that democracy has the resolute will to defend itself. Tolerance is not necessarily indifference; the pluralist order is obviously founded on the recognition of particular values, and is not `value free' or neutral; also, the indifference of the law presupposes no neutrality of values; it is anchored in a social philosophy. In order to defend itself, the pluralist order should voice those values ceaselessly and loudly. There is nothing astonishing or outrageous about the fact that within the pluralist society, the defenders and enemies of its basic principles are not treated with exactly the same indifference; it is quite possible to treat them differently without harming citizens' rights or the principle of tolerance. A pluralism that acquired from its own norms carelessness about its existence and made it a virtu