Acquiring higher social rank is possible in differ-ent ways based on four main sources of power (eco-nomic, military, ideological, and political or fam-ily social power) (Feinman 1995; Hayden 1995; Earle 1997). These are not mutually exclusive cat-egories by any means; leaders or chiefs can gener-ally use them in combination (Mann 1986; Earle 1997, 6-8). Namely, a complex system of social in-equality with power of different origins can exist in a society. In spite of this, archaeologists usually concentrate only on the economic or political way of obtaining power, neglecting the role of religion, rituals or ideology when they analyse prehistor-ic social inequalities. In analysing archaeological finds they usually treat presumed or real ritual ar-tefacts or features absolutely independently from this "secular" power, although these are often firmly interconnected. This has two main reasons: first, according to the processual approach, social structure and the religion/belief system are each independent subsystems of the archaeological cul-ture (Clarke 1968, Fig. 23; Renfrew 1972, 15-44, 440-504). Secondly, they consider the sacred and profane as universal dichotomies (Eliade 1994; Durkheim 2003). However, evidence frequently suggests that this dichotomy does
ThriftBooks sells millions of used books at the lowest
everyday prices. We personally assess every book's quality and offer rare, out-of-print treasures. We
deliver the joy of reading in recyclable packaging with free standard shipping on US orders over $15.
ThriftBooks.com. Read more. Spend less.