The Portable Machiavelli

by Niccolò Machiavelli

Book Overview

In the four and a half centuries since Machiavelli's death, no single and unanimously accepted interpretation of his ideas has succeeded in imposing itself upon the lively debate over the meaning of his works. Yet there has never been any doubt about the fundamental importance of Machiavelli's contribution to Western political theory.The Portable Machiavelli brings together the complete texts of The Prince, Belfagor, and Castruccio...

• Format: Paperback
• Language: English
• ISBN: 0140150927
• ISBN13: 9780140150926
• Release Date: January 1979
• Publisher: Penguin Group
• Length: 576 Pages
• Weight: 0.90 lbs.
• Dimensions: 1.0" x 5.1" x 7.8"
• Age Range: 18 years and up
• Grade Range: Postsecondary and higher

Customer Reviews

A Wonderful Book

Here it is, Machiavelli's work in its sinister glory for all to behold. The truth of man's corruption and dishonesty is exposed for all the world to see. The wise Florentine is not to be blamed and scandalised for lifting the veil on the cesspool of politics, religion and royalty. No, he is to be congratulated for summarising the dastardly deeds committed by Popes, Princes, Kings and Emperors. Without Machiavelli to set us right, some of us may believe politics is a noble profession. Use "The Portable Machiavelli" to see through the hazy rhetoric used by spin doctors, or as a tool to aid effective management strategies, or simply for entertainment purposes. If you are unfamiliar with Machiavelli's work then prepare yourself for a shock. It's not a guidebook for tyrants, as many commentators may suggest, it's more of a literary equivalent of smelling salts. Once we have read Machiavelli's work we awaken with a clearer idea of the reality around us.

Lessons from Machiavelli

Lessons from Machiavelli 1)He who hesitates as a ruler is lost 2) Mercenary armies are never to be trusted. To rule securely one must have a defense force made of one's own people. 3) Christian virtue is the opposite of political wisdom. 4) A government of one type, whether it be monarchy, oligarchy, or democracy will become corrupt. 'Mixed government is good government.' 5) A ruler must be ruthless with his enemies. 6) Inflexibility for a ruler will inevitably lead to failure. 7) There are times it is wise to negotiate. Machiavelli felt his beloved Florence was conquered by the Spaniards only because the Florentines refused at a time propitious to them , negotiations. 8) The ancient Greeks and Romans ruled at times more wisely than the city- state Italians of his own times. 9) 'Courage does help make ' Fortune' but Fortune is nonetheless fickle and unreliable even to the brave. 10) It is better for a ruler to be feared than to be loved. 11) Political murder is justified when it leads to the preservation of the polity. 12)Even the greatest of men are subject to Fortune. 13) The study of ancient socieites and history gives relevant lessons for present political behavior. 14)If one does not have an Army one cannot preserve one's power. 15)The political task of Religion is inspiration of public loyalty. 16) The commonwealth, the political entity is more important than the individual. 17)

The complete works of a man we all know - or do we?

We all learned about him in elementary school: some author in the early Renaissance who wrote a book on governing that included such phrases as "the end justifies the means" and "it is better to be feared than love." From that education, one would think this is a man who would adore such leaders as Hitler who used their political prowess to get to the top. After purchasing and reading this collection, however, I have come to one conclusion: any one who speaks of Machiavelli that way has never read Machiavelli. Edited and translated by Peter Bondanella and Mark Musa, "The Portable Machiavelli" not only gives the casual reader a chance to read different personal and professional works of Machiavelli, but also strives to do away with many of the myths that have plagued the man's posthumous fame. For example, the famous "the ends justifies the means" quote is actually a gross exaggeration of what Machiavelli originally wrote, which was "in the actions of all men...when there is no impartial arbiter, one must consider the final result." The biggest counterargument Bondanella and Musa can supply is the simple fact that they include a less famous piece Machiavelli did called "The Discourses." This piece is often not mentioned or even casually footnoted because it presents the true Machiavelli - a man who was supportive of a Republic government run by the citizens. Any one who believes Machiavelli is a supporter of despots will be surprised to read him speaking in support for fair and public trials and a balance of power between rulers and their people. Even if you already know the above, this is still a good read. Machiavelli presents some fine insight into government not only in the Renaissance (which, in fact, "The Prince" was meant to do) but also for the future. "The Discourses" offers insight into how to manage a Republic and its laws, while presenting past examples (many times from the ancient Romans or even Medieval history) and arguments against those that might protest a Republican form of government. Footnotes and editor notes through out the book offer insight into what Machiavelli refers to or means in specific passages - even pointing out a half-truth in one chapter. Even if you disagree with Machiavelli or the purpose he stands for, he presents his points in a well-meaning, educated manner and you can't help but read and be fascinated. This is a wonderful collection and I would highly recommend it to either fans of Machiavelli, as well as those interested in government or Medieval history. It was certainly worth my money and time.

Humour and Virtue from Machiavelli?

In the course of my political science training, I studied at great length the modern idea of realpolitik. In that study I came to realise that it was somewhat incomplete, without the companionship of 'The Prince', by Niccolo Machiavelli, a Florentine governmental official in the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries. 'The Prince' is an oft quoted, oft mis-quoted work, used as the philosophical underpinning for much of what is considered both pragmatic and wrong in politics today. To describe someone as being Machiavellian is to attribute to the person ruthless ambition, craftiness and merciless political tactics. Being believed to be Machiavellian is generally politically incorrect. Being Machiavellian, alas, can often be politically expedient.Machiavelli based his work in 'The Prince' upon his basic understanding of human nature. He held that people are motivated by fear and envy, by novelty, by desire for wealth, power and security, and by a hatred of restriction. In the Italy in which he was writing, democracy was an un-implemented Greek philosophical idea, not a political structure with a history of success; thus, one person's power usually involved the limitation of another person's power in an autocratic way. Machiavelli did not see this as a permanent or natural state of being -- in fact, he felt that, during his age, human nature had been corrupted and reduced from a loftier nobility achieved during the golden ages of Greece and Rome. He decided that it was the corrupting influence of Christianity that had reduced human nature, by its exaltation of meekness, humility, and otherworldliness. Machiavelli has a great admiration for the possible and potential, but finds himself inexorably drawn to the practical, dealing with situations as they are, thus becoming an early champion of realpolitik carried forward into this century by the likes of Kissinger, Thatcher, Nixon, and countless others. One of the innovations of Machiavelli's thought was the recognition that the prince, the leader of the city/state/empire/etc., was nonetheless a human being, and subject to all the human limitations and desires with which all contend. Because the average prince (like the average person) is likely to be focussed upon his own interests, a prince's private interests are generally in opposition to those of his subjects. Fortunate is the kingdom ruled by a virtuous prince, virtue here not defined by Christian or religious tenets, but rather the civic virtue of being able to pursue his own interests without conflicting those of his subjects. Virtue is that which increases power; vice is that which decreases power. These follow Machiavelli's assumptions about human nature. Machiavelli rejected the Platonic idea of a division between what a prince does and what a prince ought to do. The two principle instruments of the prince are force and propaganda, and the prince, in order to increase power (virtue) ought to employ force completely and ruthlessly, and p

Machi at his best

Aside from being a concise collection of Machiavelli's important political works, this volume serves another great purpose - it shows you a side of Machiavelli never seen before by publishing the HILARIOUS letters to his brother. The letter to his brother about his encounter with a prostitute is absolutely hysterical. This volume provides selections which show you both sides of Machiavelli - the serious political scientist and the satirical, comical human being.