Why have Foundational Black Americans made real economic progress during certain periods of U.S. history-only to stall or fall backward in others?
In The Opportunistic Buffer, Andrew Martin introduces a clear, testable framework for understanding this pattern. Drawing on labor history, economics, and demographic data, the book argues that large immigration flows have repeatedly functioned as an opportunistic buffer in American labor markets-making racial exclusion cheaper, easier, and more deniable-while periods of labor scarcity have constrained discrimination by forcing inclusion despite persistent racism.
The analysis compares distinct historical eras with sharply different immigration regimes, from the mass European inflows of 1880-1914 to the low-immigration "Golden Era" of 1924-1965, when Black employment, wages, and family stability rose dramatically. The modern period is treated more cautiously: immigration is analyzed as a powerful amplifier of harm operating alongside deindustrialization, mass incarceration, and automation-especially affecting Black men's ability to secure stable provider-level work.
This is not an anti-immigrant argument, nor a monocausal explanation of racial inequality. Claims are tiered by evidentiary strength, confounding factors are addressed directly, and falsification criteria are stated openly. The book separates analysis from advocacy, focusing on mechanism, history, and consequence rather than ideology.
For scholars, The Opportunistic Buffer offers a disciplined framework that can be tested, refined, or challenged. For the community, it names a pattern many have lived through but rarely seen taken seriously: progress comes when exclusion becomes costly-and stalls when the buffer is refilled.