The New Testament Can Only Be Correctly Understood by Scholars: Oh really?

By Ds Waggoner

Contrary to popular scholarly opinion, there's not even one remotely explicit "virgin birth" passage in the earliest found New Testament manuscripts. The birth narratives are ambiguous enough to be interpreted either as a virgin birth, or as a natural birth, depending on whether one uses Jewish scriptures as context, or Roman legend. Rome's "virgin birth" interpretations of the birth narratives have dominated the world view of the Gospels of Matthew and Luke for nearly 2000 years, until one Jewish man was able to get a peek at what the birth narratives actually say, void of trinitarian hearsay. In The New Testament Can Only Be Correctly Understood by Scholars, three attorneys (Ian, Jerome and Sarah) argue the birth narratives of the New Testament before work every morning. The three attorneys (a Jew, a Catholic and a Protestant) unknowingly sharpen one another as they hotly debate what the Bible says, or rather, how to interpret the birth passages in light of what the Bible says. Sarah provides documented, historical evidence that the New Testament gospels of Matthew and Luke could rightly be interpreted by a Jew to be saying Jesus had a biological father. And only fools hate comparing both sides of the story before making a decision...

• Format: Paperback
• Language: English
• ISBN: B087SLPX28
• ISBN13: 9798642276853
• Release Date: May 2020
• Publisher: Independently Published
• Length: 224 Pages
• Weight: 0.67 lbs.
• Dimensions: 0.5" x 6.0" x 9.0"