Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise

by Alfred D. Chandler Jr.

Book Overview

This book shows how the seventy largest corporations in America have dealt with a single economic problem: the effective administration of an expanding business. The author summarizes the history of... This description may be from another edition of this product.

• Format: Paperback
• Language: English
• ISBN: 0262530090
• Release Date: August 1969
• Publisher: MIT Press
• Length: 488 Pages
• Weight: 1.35 lbs.
• Dimensions: 8.0" x 1.2" x 5.3"

Customer Reviews

Such a great fundamental perspective on the analysis of a business

The early wrestling with the (at that time) new corporate structure and the optimal construction of hierarchy and communication chains is probably the best treatment of how to analyze a corporate structure. Viewed from what I would consider to be the outside, before business books became a form of trash novel, Chandler's construction of what we now consider the bedrock of strategic analysis is still one of the best conveyers of the perspective needed to truly understand the corporate world. It is all about enabling coordinated execution while allowing the flexibility and autonomy necessary to make the best responses to uncertain and changing external market conditions. This is not an easy read but is definitely worth it. An incredibly interesting and insightful book. If only business research had continued to go down this path rather than postulating the drither and sales of artificial truths that it currently does.

Strategy drives structure while structure drives strategy

Chandler's book is excellent and I find myself reading it again and again as I mature as a manager. I ask myself why do some organizations act and seem so different from others? Well, Chandler's book points the way to at least some of those reasons. Using Harvard's Case Method, Chandler is Professor Emeritus at the Harvard Business School, his facts are presented in a context - a story problem if you will. Crisply written, his chapters show how large corporations struggled with organizing themselves as burgeoning growth taxed the administrative reach of the management team.Chandler tells us that during the Civil War era most American enterprises were managed by a superintendent, almost along the lines of an agrarian model, like a mechanized plantation. But with the coming of Ford Motor, Standard Oil, General Motors, DuPont, Sears, and other familiar names in America's business pantheon, the larger organizations could no longer rely on the superintendent, or owner - even if aided by able men - to operate on such a large scale, let alone build industrial empires.What I think is key in Chandler's analysis is that, like a Möbius loop, the strategy drives the structure while the structure drives the strategy of an organization. The layering of management and the span of control become crucial and delegating the day-to-day details of entire management functions becomes inevitable. The various senior managements created autonomous divisions. That was one thing. Yet having the divisions mesh smoothly in a gear-work structure, that was another, and one that these organization-builders solved as their corporations rose to industry leadership. And Chandler shows that it was not an overnight thing and how management wrestled with the intricacies of making it all work.The book really has three basic parts. The first part, the introduction, gives us the landscape before the rise of the modern corporation. In the second part, Chandler presents four well written examples of how business leaders struggled with putting corporate structures together at DuPont, General Motors, Standard Oil, and Sears Roebuck - certainly four different industries that had somewhat overlapping and somewhat different products, channels of distribution, and hence, somewhat different, yet somewhat similar problems. Some authors would be very dry, but Chandler makes this at least as interesting as any article targeted toward the reader of "Fortune," "Business Week," or "The Wall Street Journal." He makes the characters come alive and the problems become real and immediate. His third part, one which only now as a more senior manager I have come to grasp more fully, is why these organizations became what they were. It had to do with the personalities of the leaders and certain common traits they demonstrated.Chandler copyrighted "Strategy and Structure" in 1962 and that might turn some readers off, believing that his facts and issues are out of step and out of date. Yet, Sun Tzu's "The Art

Strategy and Structure

This book is a management "classic" and tells how American corporations have dealt with a common economic problem - the effective administration of an expanding business. Chandler's main point is that the structure of a company depends on the strategy of the company - a company must determine its strategy before it can organize properly. He also feels that corporations have two management tiers. VP's or executives set the vision of the company and then managers execute the vision.Chandler summarizes the history of the expansion of the nation's largest industries during the past hundred years. He then examines in depth the modern decentralized corporate structure as it was developed independently by four companies - Dupont, General Motors, Standard Oil, and Sears. In all fours cases, firms had to deal with their growing business. When firms had a good strategy, they developed the proper organization. Without a good strategy, various reorganizations were required. However, the growing economy solved many of their organization and strategy problems.