Artillery has gone through two previous evolutions in employment methodology. The first, starting in 1670, saw it evolve from primarily a siege engine, to a precision mobile direct fire support platform. The second evolution in methodology began in 1865 and saw the precision mobile direct fire support platform evolve into a volume fire indirect fire support platform, which culminated in the Russo-Japanese War. The thesis of this paper is that through a historical examination of the evolution of the method of employment during those two periods, this monograph proves that the arrival of precision munitions heralds the onset of another evolutionary employment method for the field artillery. This method will emphasize precision fires over indirect volume fire. In order for this evolution to occur, the field artillery community must avoid the same type of evolutionary stagnation that occurred after the American Civil War. Each evolution saw improvements, of varying degrees, in four areas and Improvements in mobility, precision, target discrimination and communications all interacted to a varying degree to force change. These are used as the evaluation criteria for each period. The author determined that when moving from siege to direct fire, only improvements in mobility and precision were needed to spark an evolutionary change in employment. This was because target discrimination and communications were facilitated by the weapons proximity to the target. When the method of employment moved beyond the direct fire mode to volume indirect fire, it took improvements in communications and target discrimination to spark a new method of employment. Technology has improved the volume indirect fire method with weapon systems that are capable of self-location and self-calculation of firing data. Precision guided munitions such as the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System and the Excalibur artillery round have effectively removed the errors that occur with long-range weapon syste
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.