The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

By Sergei Nilus, Matvei Vasilyevich Golovinski, Anonymous, et al.

Book Overview

The general conclusion is that "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is a fraudulent fiction, but its impact and effect in the early part of the 1900s was unquestionably real. Originating in Russia, it landed in the English-speaking world where it caused great consternation. Much is made of German anti-semitism, but in fact, there was fertile soil for "The Protocols" across Europe and even in America. In the United States, Henry Ford put his weight behind distributing the book.

One of the disturbing elements of the manuscript is that, setting aside the role the Jews are said to play in the unfolding of affairs, there is a great deal described in the book that has come about. It is probably this fact that has kept "The Protocols" in the public eye. The question seems to be: "If it is not the Jews who brought this about, then who?" Considering the Russian source and what was soon to befall Russia, perhaps the most obvious candidate are the Marxists, with the "Protocols" being an attempt to deflect attention away from themselves. Perhaps "the Protocols" were not the minutes of a meeting of Zionists, but rather the minutes of a Bolshevik party meeting. Maybe, some day we will know for sure. In the meantime, for sheer historical value, "The Protocols" is essential reading.

• Format: Hardcover
• Language: English
• ISBN: 1947844970
• ISBN13: 9781947844971
• Release Date: January 1
• Publisher: Suzeteo Enterprises
• Length: 96 Pages
• Weight: 0.50 lbs.
• Dimensions: 0.4" x 5.5" x 8.5"

Customer Reviews

I LOVED it! Every word in it! All you have to do is look around yourselves today (2026) ...

The tribe tried, unsuccessfully, to paint this marvel as a "dirty conspiracy". Libel, they all screamed in unison! What these snakes never seem to understand, is the intrinsic evil of their creed and culture! Instead of repenting, changing and joining our common humanity as equals, they're busy these days, swinging their power, which the world, under the treat of continued guilt-tripping, allowed them to amass, but not for great causes and rather for more evil, war, censorship and chaos! If at some point in recent history we were willing to "turn the other cheek" and give these vipers a chance (one last perhaps!), the world is now aware of their evil and this book, only attests to it ... as a dirty and despicable conspiracy, which we should never believe or fall for (tongue in cheek)! You be the judge ... because the jury has already done its job!

The future foreseen

Amazing book which describes a plan that accurately predicted most of the conditions we are currently living under.

A forgery but interesting from the historic view point

The Protocols were first published in 1903 by Pavel Krushevan, an instigator of the Kishinew pogrom, in his Russian newspaper called Znamia. The book is usually composed a certain number of protocols, from 24 to 27. This is definitively an interesting work, if we take into account the historic aspects. In my view, it is a shallow anacronism to judge a book today because of the mentality of some people who lived in Russia 100 years ago.

A Russian forgery that affected history

There is a very important lesson to be learned in how this rather silly short book was able to captivate the minds of millions of people since its publication in the beginning of a century. And this is in spite of conclusive evidence that it is a fraud - probably written by a Russian monk - being widely available since 1920s. It was, for example, one of the sources of inspiration for, and is specifically quoted in Mein Kampf. It continuous to be important: even to-day it is a bestseller in a number of Middle Eastern countries. For a detailed analysis of the book, see "A Lie and a Libel : The History of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion" by B. W. Segel; for those new to the subject, I would recommend getting both of these books at the same time. A copy of the Protocols is always close by in my office, just next to Mein Kampf. One might argue that historically the Protocols is the more influential one of the two.