Pre-Christian Gnosticism

By Edwin M. Yamauchi

Book Overview

One of the most important issues facing New Testament scholarship today is the issue of Gnosticism. So wrote the author in 1973 in the first edition. With the publication since then of the entire Nag Hammadi library, this observation has become even more incisive. Was there a pre-Christian Gnosticism? Did Gnosticism directly or indirectly influence nascent Christianity? Many modern scholars argue that Gnosticism preceded the emergence of New Testament Christianity and constituted the raw material from which the apostles formed their message about Jesus. The author here analyzes the evidence used to support this thesis. He notes a series of methodological fallacies in the use of this evidence and concludes that clearly Gnostic materials are late and pre-Christian materials are not clearly Gnostic. A new chapter in this paperback edition brings the discussion up to date.

• Format: Paperback
• Language: English
• ISBN: 1592443966
• ISBN13: 9781592443963
• Release Date: September 2003
• Publisher: Wipf & Stock Publishers
• Length: 280 Pages
• Weight: 0.75 lbs.
• Dimensions: 0.6" x 5.6" x 8.5"

Customer Reviews

Important, balanced, and brilliant.

Yamauchi's book "Pre-Christian Gnosticism" is a survey of all the different scholars who argued that early Christianity borrowed, or was influenced by, the Gnostics. Could any scholar be more balanced? Yamouchi is simply wonderful in his careful discussion of all the evidence. Without exception, he is fair to each scholar's opinion. Indeed, he scarcely gives his opinion until the last few chapters. Then, after a careful weighing of the various arguments, he finds: "An impressive array of scholars both in the past and in more recent times have come to the conclusion that the Gnostic Redeemer figure as described by Reitzenstein and Bultmann, and as attested in the Hymn of the Pearl, the Manichaean and the Mandaean tests is simply a post-Christian development dependent upon the figure of Christ, rather than a pre-Christian myth upon which the New Testament figure of Christ depends" (p 165). And again, "As Wilson states: 'The myth of the Urmensch-Redeemer has been adequately examined by others, and the view that such a myth, if it ever existed, exercised a formative influence on the early Church is now generally rejected" (p 166). Many scholars now argue that the evidence suggests that the Gnostics borrowed ideas from Christianity, not the other way around. In conclusion, Yamouchi writes: "In the case of the New Testament texts we have not Gnostic texts which are older, and the evidences which have been adduced to prove the priority of Gnosticism over Christianity have been weighed in this study and found wanting" (p 186). Anyone interested in this topic should also read the other famous study on Gnosticism, "A Separate God, The Origins and Teachings of Gnosticism" by Simone Petrement.