The aim of this thesis is to contribute to the current scientific debate on political inclusion by evaluating the practical applicability of three paradigmatic strategies from an ethical perspective. These approaches are the theory of gender liberation by Luce Irigaray, the theory of social agonism by Chantal Mouffe and Ernesto Laclau, and the cosmopolitan political perspective as presented in the works of Nancy Fraser, Etienne Balibar, Joshua Cohen, and Oliver Marchart. I choose these approaches from a variety of theoretical accounts based on the assumption that they present paradigmatic cases for approaching political inclusion today. The main criterion according to which I classify these approaches is their position with regard to the Other because projects of inclusion by definition deal with the status of the Other.