The Enneads: Abridged Edition

by Plotinus

Book Overview

Here is a highly original synthesis of Platonism, mystic passion, ideas from Greek philosophy, and variants of the Trinity and other central tenets of Christian doctrine by the brilliant thinker who has had an immense influence on mystics and religious writers.

For more than seventy years, Penguin has been the leading publisher of classic literature in the English-speaking world. With more than 1,700 titles, Penguin Classics represents a global...

• Format: Paperback
• Language: English
• ISBN: 014044520X
• ISBN13: 9780140445206
• Release Date: November 1991
• Publisher: Penguin Group
• Length: 688 Pages
• Weight: 0.99 lbs.
• Dimensions: 1.2" x 5.1" x 7.8"
• Age Range: 18 years and up
• Grade Range: Postsecondary and higher

Customer Reviews

An inspired system of spiritual philosophy

_The Enneads (the Nines) is the greatest surviving work of spiritual philosophy of late antiquity. Here we have expounded Plotinus' interpretation of the perennial philosophy. We are shown that the material world has a spiritual origin, for all of creation emanates down from the divine Source, through the various levels of manifestation, to our own world. Moreover, we are shown that mankind's ultimate goal is to turn away from the distractions of this lower material creation and seek union with this divine Source (God, the One, the Good.) _While Plotinus critised the Gnostic sects of his day, it is obvious that his own idea of intuitive intellectual knowledge, where subject and object unite in perfect understanding, is pure gnosis. The main disagreement seems to have been on the nature of the material world: The Gnostics held it to be inherently evil, while Plotinus saw it as simply lower and inferior, yet basically good. _There is great wisdom in this book for those who can penetrate the traditional intuitive mindset. This only to be expected since Plotinus studied the perennial philosophy at the great library of Alexandria for over a decade. There is also the fact that Plotinus admitted to three episodes of enlightenment, epiphany, or cosmic consciousness in his life. Like all true masters, he was more of a reciever of timeless divine truths than an originator of anything new and contrived.

Arguably the greatest mind in Western culture

Plotinus ought to be read and digested by anyone who asks the ultimate question. Ultimately, his words point to a central experience - and presuppose that we wish to tread the same way. Western philosophy has had a lot of 'stick' in recent years, an inevitable reaction - given the fact that since the 18th c., much if not most Western philosophy has become a head trip - a tangle of knots. Modern philosophers like Heidegger have located the problem further back - with Platonism, and it has become a common place to see all Western philosophy as chopped logic, resulting in a fragmented perception of reality. Everything Plotinus says - points to a crowning experience, what he termed 'henosis' - realising a state of 'at-onement.' Hence, any idea of identifying Plotinus use of the term 'Nous' (translated as 'intellect' in English) with its narrower, modern equivalent, would be a fatal misunderstanding. Plotinus leaves no room for distinctions between the knower and the known, presenting a marked parallel with Buddhist intuitions. Given the extensive influence that Buddhism has exerted upon western culture in recent years, it would be a crime to ignore the fruit-ful parallels afforded by Plotinus. More to the point, a reading of Plotinus raises some serious questions about the verdict of people like Heidegger - when it comes to the history of Western philosophy. Moreover, it would not do to whinge about the Christian refutation of 'pagans,'as if the Church ignored Plotinus. His ideas influenced the early Church fathers - an influence that continued with people like Aquinus, Augustine - Eckhart etc.Hence, Heidegger's view of Western philosophy/theology as a kind of degeneration and fragmentation of 'Being' - is open to question, and one wonders why a whole generation of scholars like him, have persistently ignored what philosophers like Plotinus had to say. It is not all 'bad news.' A certain kind of 'Platonism' may well amount to what Nietzsche called 'the palest and thinnest ideas of all,' but by the same token, another form of it helped shape the intuitions of Meister Eckhart, and inspired Renaissance thinkers like Ficino. W.Y. Evans-Wentz, the noted American scholar-gypsy, a Rhodes scholar who sat at the feet of eminent Tibetan Lamas, and helped pave the way for a Western absorption of Buddhist ideas, held Plotinus in great esteem - seeing a perennial philosophy in the best of Western and Oriental civilisation.Hence, the Paul Brunton foundation endeavoured to promote a proper study of Plotinus' thought. Stephen Mackenna's translation of the Enneads was a labour of love, and gave his life to the task. It taxed Mackenna's strength, some portions of the text being completed by people like B.S. Page. The Larson edition is of especial value here, examining the nuance of various terms found in Plotinus' work - all told, the best single volume edition of the Enneads. Thanks to John Dillon's endeavours, an economically priced, abridged version of Mackenn

The most important book I have read! In a the "perfect" ed.

There is no other book that I have come across that contains all I need for the rest of my life! The Enneads is a veritable treasure and guide. I love the Larson edition because it is using MacKenna's poetic translation and compares it with four other translations, using unobstrusive endnotes. Also, the appendix by Anthony Damiani is probably the best piece on Plotinus' philosophy that I have ever read. I cannot too highly recommend this book for its beauty, rapture and yet deep rationality. It's philosophic poetry at its best!

A River of Thoughts

It seems to me that the previous reviewer just doesn't like books in this genre at all... Why review a Western - even the best Western ever written - if you hate Westerns? Anyway, I think most people who likes the writings of Rudolf Steiner, Jacob Boehme, Plato, Meister Eckhart, Madame Blavatsky, Manly Hall and the like will value this book. It's in an intellectual style, so although what he thinks is similar to what Krishnamurti or Joseph Campbell think, the style will put some people off... I personally can take either style depending on my mood, and find a certain kind of precision is won by addressing things to this extent from the intellect and another kind of poetic or musical precision is lost in this intellectual style. But then I'm basically a very nerdy sort of person trying to disguise myself as a citizen. I think just by reading a sentence here or there from the book, you can judge in a few moments whether the style and content are for you. Plotinus is a mystic. He believed the transcendent realm to be more REAL than this material realm. He believed the material realm to emanate from the transcendent realms... or to be more accurate, he didn't BELIEVE this, but he SAW this through mystical insight. And this book is just a series of some of his notes regarding the nature of things from the perspective of this higher consciousness. I just read this book for the first time a couple weeks ago at the local university library, and it immediately fell in with my favorite books. I'm the sort of person that spends a couple months preoccupied with a certain range of questions, and when I reach a certain level of clarity about them, my curiosity drifts to something else. Plotinus struck me as a wellspring of perspectives on the kinds of issues that interest me... something I'll keep returning to. If you will indulge me, let me offer a case in point... recently I have found myself interested in the question of what the relationship is between events that happen sequentially in time and the general laws of nature which govern them. My brother is a nuclear physicist. I was telling him about a couple premonitory experiences I had, and he started musing about how the current laws of physics would have to be modified account for travel backward in time... I didn't follow what he said entirely, but he did mention that the only major physical law which presumed that time moved in one direction was the second law of thermodynamics. He said that the big problem with backward motion in time was that there would have to be some kind of constraints to prevent obvious paradoxes... like you go back before you were born and kill your mother. He said that perhaps stronger constraints could be applied to the wave function to allow for this. ??? Then we started discussing how a lot of people are uncomfortable with the 'counter-intuitiveness' of quantum theory. Our tendency is to ask which particle hit which particle when