Love, Poverty, and War: Journeys and Essays

By Christopher Hitchens

Book Overview

"I did not, I wish to state, become a journalist because there was no other 'profession' that would have me. I became a journalist because I did not want to rely on newspapers for information." Love, Poverty and War: Journeys and Essays showcases America's leading polemicist's rejection of consensus and clich (c) whether he's reporting from abroad in Indonesia, Kurdistan, Iraq, North Korea, or Cuba, or when his pen is targeted mercilessly at the likes of William Clinton, Mother Theresa ("a fanatic, a fundamentalist and a fraud"), the Dalai Lama, Noam Chomsky, Mel Gibson and Michael Bloomberg. Hitchens began the nineties as a "darling of the left" but has become more of an "unaffiliated radical" whose targets include those on the "left," who he accuses of "fudging" the issue of military intervention in the Balkans, Afghanistan and Iraq. Yet, as Hitchens shows in his reportage, cultural and literary criticism, and opinion essays from the last decade, he has not jumped ship and joined the right but is faithful to the internationalist, contrarian and democratic ideals that have always informed his work.

• Format: Paperback
• Language: English
• ISBN: 1560255803
• ISBN13: 9781560255802
• Release Date: November 2004
• Publisher: Bold Type Books
• Length: 475 Pages
• Weight: 1.47 lbs.
• Dimensions: 1.3" x 5.9" x 8.9"

Customer Reviews

An emotional mixture from the master of truculency

To seek out an author with the capability of combining the gentle eloquence of the Cambridge academic with the bruising pugnacity of a tabloid columnist, and to use both in such a way as to invite rage, interest and, indeed, envy from the reader, to the precision of Christopher Hitchens would be an insufferable challenge. To find one with the sheer depth and diversity of knowledge possessed by Hitchens, I submit, would be nay-on impossible. Nowhere better is this polymathy exhibited than in `Love, Poverty & War'; an collection of various articles loosely compiled under the named themes, as well as a smaller section ruminating his adopted homeland of America. `Love' is clearly centred on Hitchens own, containing many of his literary criticisms and passionate championing of lost passion of literature. `Poverty' is much ado about culture and current social zeitgeist, particularly with regards to draconian priggishness, popular religion, political tomfoolery and David Irving. `War' is certainly Hitchen's weakest section, as he continues to triumph the war in Iraq and a failed neoconservative foreign policy. Captivating and persuasive Hitchens still is, but one cannot help but feel a sense of desperation emanating from his rhetoric, as if he himself realises that there simply is no real arguments left to use. The intellectual is certainly prevalent, but a perfect dosage of the casual is to be found within the pages of this collection. A delightful account of the author's escapades down Route 66 is certainly within this category. This is an extremely enjoyable and through-provoking book, regardless of one's inference of the author's conclusions.

Take a journey through the exigencies of love, poverty and war with the acerbic essayist Brit native

Honesty is still the best policy even when written by a noted journalist living in Washington DC! Hitchens is an atheist, secularist and first class detector of hypocrisy, evil and deceit! You may not always agree with this 21st inheritor of the mantle of such writers as George Orwell but he will engage your mind, soul and heart! This collection of essays culled from Hitchens' articles in Vanity Fair, the Nation and other prominent venues for his talents is divided into three parts: Part One-Hitchens gives us several book reviews of biographies of some of his favorite writers from Marcel Proust, Kingsley Amis; Graham Green; Aldous Huxley: James Joyce and Graham Greene. He also takes a look at the life of the Communist Trotsky. Hitchens evidences his broad literary learning in these brainy articles. Part Two: In this section deemed "Americana" Hitchens takes to the wide open American road. We go down Sunset Boulevard with Billy Wilder; take a trip on what was once Route 66 and look at the laws governing New York City. We also read his reviews of Bob Dylan's oeuvre; discover the pleasures of Hitchens' appreciation of Saul Bellows' classic The Adventures of Augie March and revist the land of Civil War reenactors. His review of the Martha Stewart empire is priceless. He also writes judicious and on target attacks on the likes of Michael Moore and Mel Gibson. Several other articles on figures from Mother Theresa (highly controversial) and the Dalai Lama are worth reading even if you disagree with them. Part Three is the most poignant of the three sections of this large book. In it Hitchens reports on the tragedy of 9-11; takes a well informed look at the gruesome situation in the Middle East and its horrible madmen incarnated in such tyrants as Ben Laden and Saddam Hussein.

Mixed bag, but mostly very good.

Hitchens is a very opinionated person. He has opinions about EVERYTHING from Mother Teresa to Kim Jong Il. Unlike most opinionated people, however, he knows what he is talking about and bases his opinion on actual experience. We all have a view about Iraq and North Korea, but how many of us travelled to either place? We all have out views about Mother Theresa, but how many of us appeared as--literally--a "devil's advocate" arguing against her cannonization? Hitchens did all this and more, so his views on these subjects are worth taking seriously and are certainly informative. What's more, Hitchens can write. He has a knack for bringing his views to life with concrete, eyewitness examples about the experiences of those who live in the countries, or know the people, that he talks about. (Hitchens, fanatically anti-any-and-all-religion, wryly comments that the "Devil's advocate" in the canonization process is usually a cardinal or Bishop who is assigned the role againt his will, while he, Hitchens, is the only person in history who appeared officially on the side of the Devil pro se, without being ordered to do so.) For these two reasons, Hitchens' writings about contemporary subjects he talks about is fresh, original, well-argued, and simply fun to read. One need not agree with Hitchens: he is bound to upset and annoy almost everybody with some of his views (How many people do YOU know who are both pro-Iraqi-War and anti-Mother-Teresa?) But that, too, is for the good: we need someone to annoy us, sometimes. No fun reading only stuff one agrees with. P.S. The essay about North Korea is worth the price of the book all by its own.

Something to bewitch, bother, and bewilder everyone

Christopher Hitchens is one of those writers whose prodigious output of letters, essays, and commentaries on the life, the universe, and everything is so pointed and provocative that he is capable of irritating anyone, sometimes repeatedly so, familiar enough with his work to have read more than just one of his essays. This should not be construed as a negative. In fact, if one is going to fall into paroxysms of anger or annoyance when reading an essay at the very least it should be well written, intelligent, and amusing. "Love, Poverty, and War" a collection of essays written by Christopher Hitchens has all three attributes in abundance and will please anyone willing to take the risk that his/her cultural or political icons may be subject to one of Hitchens' literary assaults. As noted, Hitchens is prolific. The essays in this anthology were originally printed in The Atlantic, Slate, the Nation, Vanity Fair, the Weekly Standard, and the Times Literary Supplement among other publications. In addition the anthology includes prefaces that Hitchens has written for new editions of classic works of fiction such Saul Bellow's Adventures of Augie March and Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. It is fair to say that Hitchens does not suffer fools or cultural icons gladly. In short order he takes aim at Winston Churchill, Mother Theresa, Noam Chomsky, Michael Moore, Mel Gibson, and allegedly oppressive no smoking regulations implemented by the Mayor of New York. Given the diversity of political and social views held by these subjects it is hard to accuse Hitchens of toeing a particular ideological line. One may wince, for example, when Hitchens takes on Churchill and then applaud when he eviscerates Chomsky. No matter whether one agrees with the substance of any particular essay it is hard to disagree with the intellect and writing style of the drafter. Hitchens' very success in advancing his point of view may explain the ferocity of the attacks upon him by those who have been subject to his rapier. Very few can best him intellectually (I certainly can't) or match the sheer breadth of the subjects he has no small amount of knowledge of. Of course the immediate reaction then becomes a personal attack on his motives. I expected the book to be dominated by the political and literary commentary that marks most of his writings for the Atlantic and Salon. What both surprised and delighted me was Hitchens more apolitical essays. His journey on the tattered remains of Route 66 is a brilliant piece of writing. So to is his look at Hollywood's famous Sunset Boulevard. I was also surprised by the depth of personal feelings and emotions that runs through many of Hitchens essays. This is no more apparent that Hitchens' post 9/11 essays. Hitchen's description of the deep-seated emotions that welled up in him after the attacks on his adopted country, particularly New York City is very moving. He spoke with a feeling for New York that only a true Ne

Excellent Book, As Ever

I do love Hitchens, and I'm quite fond of his tone. I wholeheartedly recommend his work. While he's not entirely convincing on the "War" issue(I think his abstracting of a "theocratic fascist" enemy is a bit problematic), otherwise he's always tight and if nothing else, fun to read. He's a bit tedious in the last Orwell book, but his essays have no remotely blunt areas--i.e., very sharp-like, all the time. As to the Dalai Llama issue raised at length below...let's see, "he has no right to denigrate our religion." No. No, that's objectively wrong. He has every right to denigrate your religion. Of course there's so many moral cowards running around right now, I can see why you'd think that. Nobody's ever bothered to denigrate your religion before. One would think there were a law against it, or something. Of course if you substitute the "religious" in "anti-religious bias" with "nonsense," as in "anti-nonsense bias," Hitchens' position may be more comprehensible.