Longer Hours, Fewer Jobs: Employment and Unemployment in the United States

by Michael D. Yates

Book Overview

Using charts, graphs, and cartoons, Michael Yates describes how unemployment, or the fear of it, is part of the life of every American worker. He outlines the changes in the structure of the labor market that have undermined the living standards of the employed. Tying these together, he provides an easily understood analysis of the economy and the social destruction brought on by its everyday functions.

• Format: Paperback
• Language: English
• ISBN: 085345888X
• ISBN13: 9780853458883
• Release Date: January 1994
• Publisher: Monthly Review Press
• Length: 160 Pages
• Weight: 0.85 lbs.
• Dimensions: 0.3" x 5.9" x 8.0"
• Age Range: 4 to 17 years
• Grade Range: Preschool to Grade 12

Customer Reviews

YOUR PARENTS ARE RIGHT!

I was a student of Mr. Yates at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown in Pennsylvania during his last term (Spring 2001). It was a very enlightening experience. He used this book as our main text and I've read it 4 times the entire way through. If you've ever heard your parents say "They raise everything up and your pay stays the same" you'll find out they are exactly right! The arguement made by Mr. Yates is even more true today with soarding energy prices and falling real wages. I recommend this book for anyone who wants to find out how the government and big business has bonded to bend us all over a barrel.

Succinct and unflinching view of capitalism

Though published in 1994 and being reviewed in 2003, this book is not irrelevant to the present. Ostensibly, the book is concerned with hours worked and employment, but it is far more a primer on the realities of capitalism and its control of the social relations of production. The timing of the book missed the economic surge of the late 1990s and the bust in the early 2000s, but the boom-bust cycle of capitalism is described and predicted by the author. During WWII and in its aftermath for 25 years, American corporations somewhat accommodated the American working class, especially those segments that had substantial union representation. But the fragility of that accord was clearly demonstrated as the global hegemony and profits of American businesses began to erode in the early 1970s. American businesses reasserted their ability to dominate the political and economic landscape by taking measures both directly and through the government to discipline the working class. The author makes abundantly clear that capitalism is by definition an economic system that is exploitative of the working class. The power of capitalists is hidden through the rhetoric of free enterprise, which holds that neutral, or "invisible," forces work to the advantage of all. The fact is that by the early 1980s and continuing through the early 1990s, the entire employment situation had changed considerably through the exercise of that power. Factories were closed, jobs moved to the South, unionization rates were slashed in half, wages declined, especially for the high school-educated, and contingent work became much more widespread, that is, part-time, temporary, and contractual. At the same time, marginal tax rates for the rich were greatly reduced, inequality in income and wealth increased, and the investing class received a huge bailout from losses incurred in the S & L scandal.In addition, unemployment levels soared throughout the 1980s, officially averaging over 7 percent across the decade. As the author points out, the unemployed are an important component of capitalism as they are an immediate source of workers, but more importantly they force the employed to moderate wage requests. However, it is not in the best interests of capitalism to have the official unemployment rate be too high. Conveniently, the Labor Dept has lax standards in defining an employed person, but stringent standards in declaring someone unemployed. The net result is an official unemployment rate that is always several percentage points below actual un- or under-employment. Though mainstream economists debate and constantly adjust the level of unemployment that is considered to be indicative of "full" employment, the author invokes President Roosevelt's State of the Union address of 1944, where he called for the right of all Americans to be employed who wanted to be, even if government is the employer of last resort. It is clear that public employment and/or a minimal guaranteed income are doabl