Ever since the groundbreaking work of George Williams, W. D. Hamilton, and Richard Dawkins, evolutionary biologists have recognized that natural selection generally does not operate for the good of the group, but rather for the good of lower-level units such as the individual, the cell, even the gene. One of the fundamental problems of biology is: what keeps competition between these various levels of natural selection from destroying the common interests to be gained from cooperation? In this volume twelve prominent scientists explore this question, presenting a comprehensive survey of the current theoretical and empirical research in evolutionary biology. Recent studies show that at many levels of biological organization, mechanisms have evolved to prevent potential conflict in natural selection. Editor Laurent Keller's aim in this book is to bring together leading researchers from all biological disciplines to outline these potential conflicts and discuss how they are resolved. A multi-level approach of this kind allows important insights into the evolution of life, as well as bridging the long-standing conceptual chasm between molecular and organismal biologists. The chapters here follow a rigorous theoretical framework, giving the book an overall synergy that is unique to multi-authored books. The contributors, in addition to the editor, are H. Charles J. Godfray, Edward Allen Herre, Dawn M. Kitchen, Egbert Giles Leigh, Jr., Catherine M. Lessells, Richard E. Michod, Leonard Nunney, Craig Packer, Andrew Pomiankowski, H. Kern Reeve, John Maynard Smith, and Eörs Szathmáry.
A Panoramic, yet Compelling, View of Multilevel Selection
Published by Thriftbooks.com User , 25 years ago
A multicellular organism has specialized structures to destroy mutant cells that wildly multiply; when these structures fail, the organism suffers from possibly lethal tumors. A beehive has workers who police the behavior of other workers to ensure that work gets done and that only queens lay eggs. Without such disciplinarians, the hive would soon fail. Humans have evolved internal behavioral structures that allow us to cooperate in society, and impel us to punish non-cooperators.All of these are instances of multilevel selection, as discussed in this fine book of essays. Some readers will be startled to find this material instead of the ancient debates over individual vs. group selection and self-interest vs. altruism---the place where the debate over multilevel selection began in the mid-1960's. The contributors are tops in their respective fields, including H. Kerne Reeve, Eors Szathmary, Richard Michod, Andrew Pomiankowski, Craig Packer, John Maynard Smith, and other equally fine biologists. Their uniting in this book shows that the group selection debate is over, at least among the knowledgeable.I loved this book, and have spent many hours following up on the other writings of the authors, both in book and article form. This book suggests what I have long had a suspicion is the case: all of biology is sociobiology, in the sense that whenever you have organisms consisting of more than one type of cell that cooperate in making a whole, you have social mechanisms involved in mediating among the divergent interests of the individual parts, and structures emerge that more or less successfully resolve the mediation problems. Darwinian selection then operates upon these mediating structures, yet in no way different from, or even in addition to, the way selection operates on individual genes.
ThriftBooks sells millions of used books at the lowest everyday prices. We personally assess every book's quality and offer rare, out-of-print treasures. We deliver the joy of reading in recyclable packaging with free standard shipping on US orders over $20. ThriftBooks.com. Read more. Spend less.