"Judge Jenkins" is a compelling biographical and historical examination of David Jenkins, the renowned Welsh judge and staunch Royalist who became a symbol of constitutional resistance during the English Civil War. This work by William H. Terry delves into the life and legal principles of a man who famously defied the Long Parliament, asserting the supremacy of the Crown and the established law of the land against revolutionary forces.
The narrative explores Jenkins's unwavering commitment to his convictions, tracing his career from the bench to his long imprisonment in the Tower of London and Newgate. Terry provides a detailed account of the legal arguments and political climate of the 17th century, highlighting Jenkins's role as a figure who refused to acknowledge the authority of a court he deemed illegal. His story is not just one of personal bravery, but a profound study of the tensions between executive power, parliamentary authority, and the judicial system during one of England's most turbulent eras.
This scholarly volume serves as an essential resource for those interested in British legal history, the Stuart period, and the development of constitutional thought. "Judge Jenkins" offers a vivid portrait of a man whose legacy remains a testament to the enduring struggle for the rule of law and the complexities of judicial integrity in times of political upheaval.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you may see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.