How America Lost Iraq

By Aaron Glantz

Book Overview

A reporter in Iraq shows how the U.S. squandered its early victories and goodwill among the Iraqi public and allowed the newly freed society to descend into violence and chaos. Here is a brutally... This description may be from another edition of this product.

• Format: Hardcover
• Language: English
• ISBN: 1585424269
• ISBN13: 9781585424269
• Release Date: May 2005
• Publisher: Tarcher
• Length: 303 Pages
• Weight: 1.15 lbs.
• Dimensions: 1.1" x 6.3" x 8.8"
• Age Range: 18 years and up
• Grade Range: Postsecondary and higher

Customer Reviews

Balanced

Glantz punctures both left and right in this balanced analysis of what has gone wrong in Iraq. A powerful story that should be required reading for politicians and political groupies of all leanings.

We would know what the Iraqi people wanted if we actually listened to them!

Aaron Glantz, a Pacifica radio correspondent, painstakingly traces where and how the United States repeatedly messed up in Iraq. His title radically differs from other books on the subject, using multiple sources to deliver one of the most multidimensional and sophisticated critiques of Iraq. Specifically, he talks to the Iraqi people themselves to get their own perspectives on this event. Not surprisingly, they were initially skeptical of his intentions, but he built up enough trust to produce this book. It is disturbing that talking to the Iraqi people themselves is considered a radical action. Saddam Hussein was this infamous tyrant who appeared uninterested in his own people's well being so they were happy to get rid of him--until they also lost what basic services which they had been previously receiving. Glantz then writes that suicide bombings can be profitable for people who have been and are receiving little money otherwise in an allegedly rebuilt Iraq (pp. 119-120). Because I predominantly receive my own news about Iraq (and the Middle East) from American news media, I had not previously considered the economic incentives to participate in a suicide bombing. Some people are participating in these activities to feed themselves and/or their families, with many other options currently unavailable. I had honestly assumed that the people who participated in these events were doing this for socioreligious sincerity alone; however I guess it's easy for Washington officials to moralize and grandstand when they don't have to worry about their own children starving. Glantz also critiques us on the left for getting too in love with protesting against this very war. According to him, we are loosing perspective of the larger goal, again because we are also predominantly coming from and with an American-centric perspective. While we need to be concerned what is happening with American soldiers and tax dollars, we cannot forget that the Iraqi people might lack even the most rudimentary services which we take for granted. We talk about how hard organizing is, but many American activists (myself included) live in a country where we know that sanitation and electricity is working and we do not have to worry about roadside bombs as we travel around our cities. Perspective is everything in and to effective community organizing. There is considerable irony that President Bush and the Republican-controlled United States Government are so eager to talk about self-rule and democracy, but will not let the Iraqi people actually control their own lives.

Highly Credible Account

Aaron Glantz, along with everyone else in their right mind, is obviously critical of the US presence in Iraq, however, his account is unique in several important respects. First of all, due to his courageous approach in working outside of areas secured by US forces, he offers unique insights into how this disaster continues to evolve. Secondly, his perspective is refreshingly credible; the reader can easily follow how and why he arrives at his conclusions. In most critical analyses of the Iraq invasion and occupation, the authors seem to have already made up their minds, and proceed to justify their conclusions. Unlike such hysterical screeds, Glantz's book is not only highly credible, but exceptionally well written.

The story the reporters have missed

Aaron Glantz has penned a treasure with How America Lost Iraq. A little over two years have passed since the American invasion of Iraq began, and conditions on the ground in Iraq are largely the same as or even worse than they were just after the invasion. This book explores why. In his search for the answers, Glantz actually behaves as a real journalist. Unlike most Western reporters who file their stories without having real contact with the people about whom they are reporting, Glantz courageously ventures throughout Iraq, visits cities many reporters probably do not even know exist, and puts his finger on the pulse of Iraqi public opinion. In light of the fact that Glantz is a reporter for Pacifica Radio, his frankness and objectivity were surprising. Many liberals will identify with Glantz's cynicism of the American military's tactics and intentions, but to my (and his) surprise, he confesses that his cynicism may have been partially baseless. The American military DID try to avoid civilian deaths by bombing only military installations. Furthermore, most Iraqis immediately after Saddam's fall welcomed the American military as liberators. Where Glantz hits his stride, however, is his detailing of how the Iraqi gratitude transformed into contempt, how the U.S. truly did manage to "lose Iraq" through a brutal and counter-productive occupation. Readers cannot help but despair as they read account after account of U.S. forces digging themselves deeper into a quagmire through brutal suppression, collective punishment, and an assortment of other egregious practices. The violent Iraqi responses to these activities lead to more crack-downs, which in turn spur more Iraqi violence, creating a never-ending spiral of escalating brutality. The most important question Glantz raises is, why do so many in America see the occupation as necessary to quell violence when he has seen up close that it has done nothing but to incite violence? Our policies, Glantz implies, are difficult to comprehend in light of what is actually taking place on the ground. And he is right. How America Lost Iraq is not remarkable only because of the depth of the research or only because of the clarity of Glantz's analysis, both which should place this book high on anybody's to-read list. Rather, it is Glantz's gift of storytelling which adds the spike to otherwise generic punch. The smoothness of his prose and the tightness of his narrative bring immediacy to the events he describes, compelling the reader to accompany Glantz and his translators on their dangerous travels. In the end, those travels lead to one place: the realization that the current occupation of Iraq is tragic. It has caused untold suffering for Iraqis who were looking forward to peaceful self-determination after decades of Saddam; it has led an American army of potential liberators to commit war crimes due to high-level mismanagement; and it raises serious questions about the level of awareness o

Recommended.

Aaron Glantz, a reporter for Pacifica Radio, has written a compelling first hand account of his experiences in Iraq between early 2003 and early 2005. This is new journalism at its best. Mr. Glaantz is very upfront about where he is coming from as a supporter of human rights for all, whether they be Americans, Sunnis, Shiites, Kurds, or Iraqi Christians. He is quite willing to acknowledge the atrocities of Saddam's regime as well as of the terrorists and U.S. forces. Living among the Iraqi people and sometimes mistaken for one by U.S. soldiers, he brings clarity to a complex situation and puts a human face on people under enormous pressure that you won't soon forget. Glaantz's honesty comes through in a way you never see in the mainstream media, whose reporters are often isolated from the day to day lives of Iraqis in their suites at the Palestine hotel. He is also quite willing to turn his eyes on himself, asking "How many people can you interview whose relatives have been killed before you start to crack--or worse, tune it all out?" In addition to a strong narrative arc that describes how American liberators became occupiers became oppressors, the book is filled with details and conversations that make pieces of the puzzle that is Iraq fall into place. To pick one example, his discussion of kidnappings in Iraq brings up thought-provoking points that one rarely hears voiced. Glaantz notes an Associated Press report that "80 percent of the roughly 170 foreigners kidnapped in Iraq had been peacefully released. Overall, it seemed hostages directly involved in the occupation [this would include contractors working for the military] fared much worse than their civillian counterparts" (217). Details that should be reassuring turn out to be disturbing, such as Glaantz's comment that the soccer stadium converted into a mass grave in Fallujah "turned out to be a lot smaller than I imagined it" which necessitated the bodies being buried very close together, "and each mound has a small concrete slab as a headstone, the name of the person hand-scrawled with red paint. Sometimes there are more than one name" (273). Although he gives you his own opinions (and identifies them as such), many of the book's most powerful moments come when he gives the voices of the Iraqis scope. To take one example, a simple conversation with a shopkeeper suggests a chillingly plausible reason for the number of suicide bombers: there are people willing to pay them, rumors suggesting one might get as much as $250,000. As the shopkeeper explains, "Of course some people will take money to explode themselves . . . That way their family and and their grandchildren will be able to live well in the future." While huge sums go to military contractors and to protect oil interests, little goes to help the locals. As the shopkeeper wistfully comments, "If some of the money went to unemployed Iraqi people . . . there would be fewer bombings" (119-20). The passage is shocking, not only