Full Faith and Credit:: The Great S&l Debacle and Other Washington Sagas

by William Seidman

Book Overview

The former FDIC/RTC chief, chosen to clean up the S & L debacle, reveals who was involved in the mess, how the government let it occur, and insider information about the resulting lawsuits. 35,000... This description may be from another edition of this product.

• Format: Hardcover
• Language: English
• ISBN: 0812921348
• ISBN13: 9780812921342
• Release Date: May 1993
• Publisher: Crown Publishing Group (NY)
• Length: 300 Pages
• Weight: 1.40 lbs.
• Dimensions: 1.1" x 6.4" x 9.6"

Customer Reviews

Systematic Collapse

1. Systematic bank collapse is a failure of one bank transmitted by a chain reaction among interconnected institutions, both financial and non-financial, the domino affect. 2. Systematic bank collapse can be aided by the failure of one bank can causing a reassessment evaluation of other similar institutions, the spillover affect. 3. Systematic bank collapse can be the result of oxogenous shock, such as, natural disease or disaster, of such magnitude; the large scale events disrupt all production processes. 4. It is important to distinguish between insolvent banks from those with temporary liquidity problems. 5. Systematic risk refers to the risk or probability of breakdowns in the entire system. Profile of a breakdown involves a clustering of bank failure due to high correlation; an event having an affect on the entire system; and risk associated with banks loaning money to other banks and these loans not being publicly known. Banks are interconnected through inte-rbank loans, loans, and payment system clearings. The losses may exceed the capital of the associated bank. Collectively, it may exceed the capital of the FDIC insurance. The complexity of the unknown creates panic where the investor starts to speculate on what other unknown he is not aware. Rather than identify the real risk he assumes all parties are guilty and sacrifices the innocent banks. 6. The smaller a bank, the more leveraged it's capital asset ratio becomes, and the more likely that it is to be driven into insolvency. The smaller bank fails earlier on the transmission change and transmits the losses located later on the chain. The speed of the domino affect is fast. 7. Spillover beings as the failure of one large financial institution or non financial firm and generates uncertainty about the values of other units potentially subject to the same shock. The risk potential is scrutinized more carefully to determine the potential for loss. Similar profiles are reevaluated and suffer reassessment shock. The banks may temporarily suspend all loans and not loan at any rate, an action representing runaway from any unit with potential risk. This is herd mentality. During the sorting out period, there will be fire-sale driven changes in quantities (flows) and interest rates are likely to overshoot the equilibrium levels, intensifying the liquidity problem. 8. Banks manage risk by increasing interest rates, monitor counter-parties more closely, accept better collateral, and having sufficient collateral to absorb risk shock. 9. US Banks have had minimal government ownership. 10. The loss of the largest two banks would cause 15 bank failures with 3% of the total banks assets, if the loss rate exceeded 65%. 65% is exceeding high for resolved banks in the US. 11. When Illinois Continental defaulted, it had 2,300 other banks holding deposits at or loaned funds to Continental, FDIC fully protected all the creditors. 12. Macro failures in banking are usually due to shortco

If you don't have anything nice to say, come sit next to me

Seidman uses the above quote in the chapter where he apportions blame for the S & L fiasco. This book contains a lot of entertaining passages, and considering it is a book about finance written by an accountant, that in itself makes the book unusual.I found the book to be well written, and very up-front about the authors biases. It was refreshing that the hidden agenda was right out in the open for everyone to inspect, just the way the author maintains that good government should operate. As Seidman states in his introduction:"Why write about these experiences?" Of course, I share the goals of most memoirists: to immortalize my contribution to society; even scores with my enemies; provide financial security for my old age, confirm the taxpayers worst suspicions about their government; and generally leave a record of my adventures for the benefit of future historians".