Climate Cover-Up: The Crusade to Deny Global Warming

by James Hoggan and Richard Littlemore

Talk of global warming is nearly inescapable these days -- but there are some who believe the concept of climate change is an elaborate hoax. Despite the input of the world's leading climate scientists, the urgings of politicians, and the outcry of many grassroots activists, many Americans continue to ignore the warning signs of severe climate shifts. How did this happen? Climate Cover-up seeks to answer this question, describing the pollsters...

• Format: Paperback
• Language: English
• ISBN: 1553654854
• ISBN13: 9781553654858
• Release Date: September 2009
• Publisher: Greystone Books
• Length: 250 Pages
• Weight: 0.55 lbs.
• Dimensions: 0.7" x 5.4" x 8.4"

Customer Reviews

Global warming deniers need to read this book!

You can tell a book hits home when the opposition (some who obviously have not even read the book) post poor reviews to lower a book's rating. Such is the case with Climate Cover-Up. If global warming deniers are willing to make that kind of effort for something as insignificant as a book review, imagine what they'll do to when it comes to protecting their own special interests. As someone who has read Climate Cover-Up from cover-to-cover, I can recommend it without reservation. In fact, I have already bought an extra copy to give away and will likely buy several more. Because I speak about human-caused global warming, all over the United States, I didn't expect this book teach me a lot that I didn't already know. Boy was I wrong! The best thing about this book is that it gives the reader a behind-the-scenes look at the campaign to deny global warming through the eyes of a public relations expert. It's kind of like a veteran quarterback telling you what's going on inside the huddle. Even if you are not passionate about saving our planet, this book is still worth the read for its excellent lesson in public relations. As I read about the brilliant but despicable tactics used by the fossil fuels industry, I couldn't help but be distracted from time to time, wondering, hmmm . . . how could I adapt that particular tactic and use it elsewhere for good? Marty Essen Author of "Cool Creatures, Hot Planet: Exploring the Seven Continents"

Not About the Science, But About the PR and "Debate"

This isn't a book restating the scientific case for global warming. It's also not a book stressing the potential consequences of acting or failing to do so with regards to climate change. Nor is it a doomsaying text predicting the end of the world. No, it's a detailed look at the PR machine behind many of the most vocal deniers of global warming, how without appropriate scientific credentials but with fat pockets laden with carbon industry cash the "dissent" and "debate" over human-influenced climate change has come about. This is Hoggan's own field of expertise--not climatology, but public relations--and he's an expert indeed. Throughout the book, Hoggan examines how "astroturf" groups (funded by a rogue's gallery of industry players with much to lose like the American Petroleum Institute, ExxonMobil, the Western Fuels Association, and so forth) have been carefully crafted to stir up public sentiment against the undeniable body of science on climate change. Hoggan points out the inherent dishonesty of their tactics, including the fundamental yet apparently so-often-ignored fact that dissent in science is expressed through research and publication, not public speaking, and, of course, the money trail leading back to the big energy companies and industry groups. He addresses several of the most notorious players--often soi-disant "experts" who spend their time preening before the podium at local events and in front of the cameras on news talk programs and who haven't done a bit of research in climatology in their lives. Hoggan looks at the myth of "Clean Coal" (pointing out there's yet to be a single such power plant built in the world--yet commercials we see on television seemingly every day would have us believe pollution-free electricity from coal is already here), and he points out the twisted interests of Canada's tar sands and their environmental costs--all of which does an excellent job of demonstrating how those with such a vested interest in denying climate change are involved in manufacturing a debate which quite simply doesn't exist within the only field which should matter: climate science. Overall, the book only really hits the tip of the iceberg, and there are many dark stories untold and dirty players left unexposed. However, the book does serve as a refreshing change from the stacks of science texts (both geared at the public and otherwise) on climate research and the many climate change denial polemics available today. If you read Hoggan's book with that in mind--that he is not intending to rehash the science, but rather highlight the PR war being waged against it--you'll probably find the book a much better read.

Important Reading

Regardless of how you feel about Climate Change, whether you believe it is man made or not, whether you believe that the debate is decided or not, this book is important. In his book Climate Cover-Up, the author James Hoggan does not attempt to prove the case for Climate Change, nor is he concerned with refuting those that do not think that we need to take immediate action. What he does attempt to do, and succeeds at doing very well, is to show how the public has been misled, confused and lied to by the hucksters that have something to gain by showing that Climate Change is fake. From his unique position as a Public Relations man, Hoggan provides startling insight into the amazingly well designed campaign to muddy the debate. Hoggan painstakingly details individuals, groups and their ties to the coal and gas industries. He reveals campaigns and exposes the lies that have been steadily fed into the public discourse until we scarcely know who to believe. He backs up his claims with solid research and information that is easily verifiable. You don't have to believe that Florida will become a swamp in 10 years to feel outraged at the deceptions that have been allowed to filter unchallenged through the debate after you read this book. For anyone that wants to know the truth about the Climate Debate cover-up, this book is essential reading. Even if you aren't interested in Climate Change itself, this book is an excellent resource to help you educate yourself about the manipulations and machinations that find their way into the public conversation.

FUD Fighters

Climate Cover-up is a book that is long overdue. For too long we have been subjected to the disinformation campaigns of many vested interests whose sole intent is to stop any meaningful action on the biggest problem facing us today. Global warming is real, we are the ones causing it and the consequences of this change will be very bad. While the media, encouraged by the biggest industrial players in energy today (big coal and big oil), has made it seem like there is doubt and confusion about global warming, the people who should know, whose jobs it is to know (such as the American National Academy of Science, which Abraham Lincoln founded to be the "supreme court" of science in America), are not confused at all. The biggest, most prestigious scientific bodies in the world all agree with the reality of global warming: it is real, we are the ones, it will be bad for us. We must stop warming up. We must stop burning coal and oil. Why don't people today all know that we are taking a terrible risk that we should not be taking? We don't all know because there are too many active vested interests trying to sow fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD). They are using the same tactics that big Tobacco used quite successfully to delay for decades significant action in reducing the number of smokers in America. Their actions are short term and short sighted, for they too will have to live in a world where the consequences of our continuing to burn fossil fuels will damage and change our civilization forever. Climate Cover-up does an excellent job of removing the wool that has been pulled over our eyes. Our democracy has been high-jacked by these vested interests. Climate Cover-up describes for us the many dirty tricks that are being used to deceive our politicians, to confuse our citizens and to stall any meaning action. Knowing how these vested interests work is an essential step in protecting our democracy. We need to be able to see through the facades and outright lies that some industry players use, not only to help us realize what is really happening to our climate, but to be alert to these same tactics when they are used by other industries, public relations companies and think-tanks for other issues, like health care. Beyond learning how the climate debate has been firstly created (there is no debate in the highest scientific organizations of the world) and then shaped by the vested interests, Climate Cover-up also provides fascinating looks into the history of the "dark side" of public relations (and the author runs a PR company, so is in a great position to understand this industry) and the use of "astroturfing," which is a pseudo-grass roots movement, designed by big oil and big coal to make it appear to our politicians that there is a real grass-roots support for not taking action on global warming, when there is no such movement. These fake grass-roots movements are called astroturfing and are used more and more frequently by industry to mislead o

An excellent intro to the hidden infrastructure of climate anti-science

ANTI-SCIENCE AND WHO DOES IT Anti-science (or agnotology), seeks to cover-up or obscure science considered inconvenient, or at least create doubt in the minds of public and decision-makers. It seeks to replace knowledge with ignorance, and has no resemblance to normal arguments within science, by scientists. Modern anti-science is most skillfully executed by a relatively small subset of lobbyists and PR agencies. Some of the most effective are actually "thinktanks". They have public identities distinct from their (often-unidentified) funders, and can often be labeled "non-profit", thus avoiding the expense of taxes. They often seek funding in the same way as lobbyist/PR agencies, as is well-documented in the Tobacco Archives. Such entities have played successful roles in activities like fending off tobacco regulation, fighting CFC regulation ("ozone hole"), fighting mercury regulation, etc. For some, their top priority has changed to obfuscating climate science. Anyone who can help keep children getting addicted to tobacco should find it easy to create confusion about climate. So, if you wonder how and why so many people, especially in North America, are confused about the current state of climate science, this is an excellent introduction to the key players and tactics. SAMPLE CHAPTERS AND TOPICS four: THE AGE OF ASTROTURFING People respond better to "grass-roots" efforts than to PR from business. If no grass-roots efforts exist, then one can set up fake ones ... astroturf. eight DENIAL BY THE POUND Within science, the only things that really count are: - publication in credible, peer-reviewed journals, a relatively low bar that mostly means "Not obviously wrong and might be worth reading." - and surviving the high bar: widespread review by scientists in the field, to see if the results stand the test of time. Many don't. A few don't survive more than a few days. But, if people cannot even get something over the low bar, they can try "petition science", in which large numbers of names are collected, sometimes including people who object violently to their inclusion as misrepresentation. This tactic is popular, but absurd: If you have heart problems, and 10 of the world's top cardiologists agree that you need a quad-bypass operation, do you listen to them? Suppose 10 brain surgeons sign a petition saying cardiologists know nothing about hearts. Do you believe *that* instead? Maybe the problem can be ignored? How about a petition with 10,000 signatures ... of brain surgeons, engineers, epidemiologists, economists, politicians, chemists, nuclear physicists, and maybe a handful of (mostly-retired or not very successful) cardiologists? Are 10,000 non-experts more believable than 10 non-experts? Are they more believable than 10 experts? nine JUNK SCIENTISTS The same people who were often helped the tobacco industry now help others, using well-honed tactics and claims of non-existent expertise. fourteen WHITEWASHING COAL "Cle