Currently NATO forces in Central Europe face a potential adversary who possesses a marked numerical superiority in artillery firepower. This fact is due in part to a political and military decision which tips our doctrine in favor of maneuver and technology. This monograph discusses the U.S. field artillery's approach to our doctrine and attempts to answer the question: Has the artillery to date succeeded in incorporating the potential, while avoiding the vulnerabilities, of recent technological developments that might defeat the Soviet artillery in the close battle? The monograph first surveys the history of Russian and Soviet artillery, specifically its reliance on massive amounts of firepower as an integral part of overall Soviet doctrine. Next, it examines the salient features of current Soviet doctrine and the U.S.'s approach to Soviet mass. Lastly, the monograph examines the field artillery's current technological thrust to determine whether new technology was grafted to the old doctrine or whether doctrine was modified to take advantage of technology. Finally, the monograph explores the doctrinal implications of employing recent technology. It concludes that doctrine is basically sound; however, steps should be taken to enhance the potential of the advances in light of Soviet attempts to counter them.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.