This study, through use of model corps, attempts to analyze the capability of the forward deployed corps to sustain itself in combat the first 5 days of a "come as you are" war in Europe. The analysis is performed in the assumed environment of the anticipated OPFOR capabilities and tactics, the United States "active defense" response, and the logistics requirements generated by that response. It attempts to determine: if the COSCOM, formulated under the "austere support" principle, is adequate to support the corps until augmentation can be effected; if the combat service support structure detracts from the corps' combat power; and what changes in the COSCOMs employment can be made to improve combat service support. The analysis indicates an organic transportation capability far less than that required which impacts on support available throughout the logistics services spectrum. Further, support plans presently in effect assume host nation support will provide logistics sufficiency. These assumptions are made although formal agreements have not been concluded, legislative difficulties exist, and the requirements have not been quantified. Recommendations of the analysis include quantifications of host nation support requirements, a reorganization of the COSCOM battalions and further, more detailed analysis in several logistics areas.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.