"The language Airmen use to understand war, society, and man's place in them reflect how Airmen think about reality. Successive generations of Airmen have evolved a worldview termed "airmindedness." Airmindedness reflects individual and group understanding built over decades through the interplay and competition between ideas. Concepts, theories, and strategies are the key ideas that reflect the Airman's basic assumptions, and Airmen use literal and figurative language to form and communicate them. This paper addresses the cognitive origins of airmindedness and attempts to fill a gap in the literature on airpower theory and strategy by arguing that airmindedness is largely a result of metaphorical thinking. It proposes and tests a theory that explains airmindedness as a resultant of a objective and subjective metaphor patterns that are the basis for airpower concepts, theories, and strategies. It argues that metaphor patterns both structure and reflect airmindedness, and that fills has serious implications for education, strategy, and action. The paper argues that airmindedness is more than a cultural or historical curiosity that Airmen must recognize the power of metaphors and that they must understand and use metaphor more strategically."--Abstract.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.