Vienna & Chicago, Friends or Foes?: A Tale of Two Schools of Free-Market Economics

by Mark Skousen

Book Overview

Is the bridge between the Austrian and Chicago schools coming together or moving apart? In Vienna and Chicago, Friends or Foes? economist and author Mark Skousen debates the Austrian and Chicago... This description may be from another edition of this product.

• Format: Paperback
• Language: English
• ISBN: 0895260298
• ISBN13: 9780895260291
• Release Date: July 2005
• Publisher: Regnery Capital
• Length: 306 Pages
• Weight: 1.02 lbs.
• Dimensions: 0.8" x 5.5" x 8.5"

Customer Reviews

Austrian vs. Chicago School: Who You Got!?

In this book Mark Skousen compares and contrasts the ideas of the two most prominent schools of free market economics. That is, the Austrian School (Carl Menger, Eugene Bohm-Bawerk, Ludwig Von Mises, Friederich Hayek, etc.) and the Chicago School (Milton Friedman, George Stigler, etc.) This book is an invaluable resource to any fan of free market economics who seeks a more in depth understanding of the intellectual history behind this subject. Mark Skousen, a prolific, pro-free-market economist and writer, is a highly qualified individual to take up this important task. He has authored over 20 books on this subject, has studied free market economics in depth and has had extensive contact with both Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek. From reading this book, you will not only get a nice overview of the history of free market economics including brief discussion of the important roles of precursors such as Adam Smith and Jean-Baptiste Say but you will also understand the finer points of both the Austrian view and the Chicago view. In particular, you will obtain a thorough understanding of the issues on which both schools passionately disagree, including their contrasting views on monetary policy, the cause and effect of business cycles and most importantly, what each school views as the proper methodology for obtaining economic truths. The only shortcoming of this book that I noticed is very minor but will be of importance to a few readers. For an individual as well versed in free market thought as Mark Skousen, he often displays a clumsy understanding of the philosophy of Ayn Rand. For example, in this book, Skousen parenthetically comments how Ayn Rand would describe Immanuel Kant's concept of reason as "objective" reason. However, those who have studied the ideas of Ayn Rand knows that she has vociferously rejected the analytic-synthetic dichotomy of Immanuel Kant, which amounts to saying that reason is utterly useless in discovering truths in what Kant calls the noumenal world (that is, an unknowable world that exists independent of our consciousness). However, this should not detract from this fantastic book he has written. I recommend this to anyone with a strong interest in laissez-faire economics and who wants to understand the finer but important contrasts between the ideas of the Austrian School and the Chicago School. If you are interested in the history of economic thought, I also recommend Mark Skousen's "The Big Three in Economics".

A Useful Comparison

The Austrian and the Chicago schools of economic thought have both made important contributions to our understanding of economics. Dr Skousen has, in an understandable and entertaining manner, presented these contributions to the general reading public. I thought Dr Skousen was very game in suggesting that the Mises Institute had a siege mentality when it came to the defense of the Austrian school. I would also suggest that their partisan position is actually hindering further research and developments based upon the Austrian paradigm.When you regard your leader or school as been the final repository of truth and wisdom, where can you go from there? This may be one reason why most Austrian economists find it so hard to get good positions in top universities. They are regarded by their peers as being closed minded! I also thought this book so good I gave it away to one of my graduate students who was leaning towards the church of Keynes. This book helped save him! A great buy and a great read!

Heady history of economics

This is a heady book - you really have to be interested in economic history and policy to dissect the finer points between the Austrian and Chicago schools of free market economics. Mark Skousen, a free market economist with strong sympathies to both camps (perhaps Austrian in the end?) writes of the history and differences between the two. The book sides with the Chicago school on it's focus on empirical data, where the Austrians prefer theoretical and logical arguements. The Chicago school suggests business cycles are purely a function of money, while the Austrian school gets solid marks for it's explanations of the temporal (capital overinvestment over time) natures of business cycles. The book is balanced enough that one can learn and make the most out of both schools. It's rooted in both the history of the ideas, as well as how they've fared over time. It also covers how the ideas have changed over time. (Chicago was initially anti-concentration of industry, but changed over time, as the data suggested industry concentration rarely created true pricing power.) Take the book with a warning though - it's not an introductory textbook, and not aimed at the uninitiated. But for those interested in various approaches to free market economics (it's not a monolith) it's an outstanding resource.

Very Informative

This book by Mark Skousen is a very well written and readable description and comparison of the Vienna (Austrian) and Chicago schools of economics. Mr. Skousen succeeds in writing an objective guide the history, theory, and differences of the two schools of economics. He also brings to light many similarities. The book is a real education in economics. And the book is so readable that I wish he had also discussed Keynesian economics into which I was educated as an economics student. The book is an invaluable exposition.

Dynamite book long overdue in the free market library!

Finally, there is a book to compare the agreements and disagreements of the Austrian and Chicago schools of economics. This will definitely be required reading for my university students in History of Economic Thought courses. I am especially thrilled to see such an evenhanded approach to so many issues, from causes of the Great Depression to types of monetary systems. Skousen is insightful, humorous, and always full of interesting tidbits that are available in no other source...because he knew so many of the players. His books are always user friendly and this is no exception. He also offers his views, but is ever respectful to all.