The Collapse of the Third Republic: An Inquiry Into the Fall of France in 1940,

by William L. Shirer

Book Overview

As an international war correspondent and radio commentator, William L. Shirer didn't just research the fall of France. He was there. In just six weeks, he watched the Third Reich topple one of the... This description may be from another edition of this product.

• Format: Hardcover
• Language: English
• ISBN: 0671203371
• ISBN13: 9780671203375
• Release Date: November 1969
• Publisher: Simon & Schuster
• Length: 1082 Pages
• Weight: 1.63 lbs.
• Dimensions: 23.9" x 15.8" x 15.8"

Customer Reviews

The best study on why democracies sometimes fail

This book is simply superb, and in the best tradition of William Shirer. No pictures, a few maps, and over 800 pages of simply excellent historical prose. In my mind, this book is more important than Shirer's more renowned "Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, (which two books should be read as companions.).The text begins in 1870, with French suffering their overwhelming defeat in the Franco-Prussian war. A non-monarchical, democratic form of government was established, but was weak from its inception. A preview of Fascism of fascism called Boulangism very neary toppled before 1000 was even reached. The shameful Dreyfus affair is carefully chronicled, as are the numerous other French failings leading up to World War I. Shirer covers this war masterfully, showing the French barely avoided catastrophe, with special emphasis being placed upon the immense casualties the French Army suffered. Luck and perhaps, Providence overcame mutinies, influenza, and occasional inept strategy, and the French and their allies won over the Central Powers The Versailles Treaty, ending the war, was heavily punitive, at French insistence, leading to German resentment and extremism, and, ultimately, to World War II. The French never saw it coming.Now begins the most fascinating part of the book;, the time between the end of World War I and 1940. The French government was headed by a succession of Premiers who were either pathetically weak /oblivious to reality, or both. An excellent case in point is Eduoard Daladier, who was primarily responsible for the state of the vaunted French Army, and who took part in appeasing Hitler at Munich in 1938. Although Daladier definitely should have known that Maurice Gamelin, the Generalissmo of the Army, was manifestly unfit for the job, he, as with Leon Blum, and numerous others, kept this vacillating coward, who would not accept the urgency of German actions, on the job. Shirer carefully shows how Gamelin, and many of his subordinates lived in the past, refusing to study new tactics dictated by fast moving masses of armor, refusing to accept the role of air power, refusing to accept intelligence reports showing a German invasion was coming and where, etc. The result was inevitable.While Gamelin enjoyed dinners, and puttered in a post far back from the front, the French Army was decimated at Sedan, and in Flanders, and, five days into the war, Gamelin calmly accepted defeat. Time and again, a little planning could have avoided this outcome. Shirer's well-researched narrative leads the reader to wonder why Gamelin wasn't executed or imprisoned for dereliction of duty after the war.Eventually, the French capitulated, and the sorry chapter of the Vichy Armistice began. After the Allies finally drove the Germans out, a different government was instituted, but the consequences of Third Republic's failures live with us yet.If there is a hero in thie sorry batch of leaders after WW I, it is Paul Reynaud, a Churchillian figure,

SHIRER'S MASTERPIECE CHRONICLES FRANCE'S DISGRACE

Although not as famous as Shirer's "Rise and Fall of the Third Reich", this book is just as important. The book gives a survey of the history of the French Third Republic from its founding in the aftermath of the humiliating defeat at the hands of Prussia in 1870, through its crisis in the Dreyfus Affair, victory in World War I and finally to the debacle of 1940. The author has the unique background of being both an accomplished journalist as well as a serious historian which gives the book a very readable style. What particularly appealed to me is his moral passion. He is no "objective, neutral observer". He is a Francophile who is willing to expose the terrible weaknesses that brought down the country he loves so much. The fact that he, as a newspaper correspondent, personally witnessed the horrors of Nazi Germany before the war gives a fervor to his writing that is refreshing in this day and age of viewing history as merely a comparison of the various "narratives" of the different sides in a conflict.Shirer begins by pointing out the important fact that at the constituent assembly that wrote the constitution for the Third Republic, the majority of the delegates were, in fact, monarchists, but they could not decide if the king should be from the House of Bourbon or Orleans, so a republican form of government was chosen as a compromise. Thus, the new regime started out on the wrong foot as something no one really wanted. Throughout its 70 years history there were always strong anti-republican movements that threatened the very existence of the regime, chronic political instability and resistance to necessary reforms (for example, women were given the vote only after World War 2). In the military realm, the exhaustion resulting from the terrible losses in World War 1 combined with a reluctance to change the strategies that worked then and obliviousness to major technological changes in armored and aerial warfare led to the ossification of the army high command and the development of the "Maginot mentality".In spite of all the disadvantages, when the German invasion began in 1940, the French stood a good chance of halting the invader. It has been repeatedly demostrated in modern warfare that the defense is very strong and that the attacker usually needs to have a clear superiority in order to prevail. Shirer demolishes the myths propagated by French Commander Weygand and others that the Germans had overwhelming superiority. In numbers of men and tanks the two sides were pretty evenly matched and the French tanks were of superior quality. The French officer corps was also much more experienced than that of the Germans because of the restrictions of the Versailles Treaty. The Germans took unbelievably huge risks in mounting their main attack through the Ardennes where there were few roads and some well-aimed air or artillery attacks could have upset the whole German plan. It is true that the Luftwaffe had aerial superiority but the author shows that

Compelling Account of Division, Defeatism, Collaboration

This book is wonderful and its great story not well known among Americans. Shirer's ambition and diligence are truly staggering - trace the evolution over 70 years of the causes of the French collapse in 1940, then vividly reveal the step by step collapse in the military, economy and politics from 1939 through June 1940. Shirer succeeds masterfully. He pulls no punches. He adeptly uses statistics to bolster his points. He is fascinating in his descriptions of the personal sides of the politicians, victims, statemen, rebels, politically oriented writers - their jealousies, their corruption, their mistresses. This is a majestic book.If I have any quibble, it is that Shirer "calls them as he sees them" (with lots of supporting evidence to be sure). This is all to the good, but to this conservative Catholic reader, it is a bit tough going to keep reading the moral pounding conservative Catholics take! Shirer also repeatedly condemns the Communists for their pacifism, their opting out of the system (and their defeatism after the Nazi-Soviet Pact) - any reader feels they are very much the secondary targets of Shirer's wrath. However, one would most suspect those on the right of sympathy toward a Fascist enemy - so perhaps I just don't like the truth! Thus, a recommendation of balance - covering different time periods - read Shirer, then read (the much shorter) "Past Imperfect" (a study of France's intellectuals' capitulation to, and self-abnegation before communism from 1944 through 1956). You will finish the two books appreciating the phlegmatic common sense of Anglo-Saxons!

Solid, Readable History

Shirer's solid narration on the troubled history of the French Third Republic (1870-1940) explains how decades of monarchism, anti-semitism, and bitter divisions weakened France and contributed to the 1940 collapse. When Shirer covers the 1940 debacle in the later chapters, it seems almost pre-destined. I liked the author's strong attention to the 1930's, when weak French governments failed to confront a re-arming Nazi Germany. William L. Shirer (1904-93) was a U.S. journalist in Europe from 1925-40 who later spent years researching the rather baffling subject of the decline of France. This volume doesn't quite match his "Rise and Fall of the Third Reich," but Shirer's immense talents are evident, and Charles De Gaulle complimented his objectivity.

Speldid art

In the opinion of this reader, Shirer has coupled his splendid evocative power of language with a subject worthy of it; the fall of France in 1940 remains one of the greatest defeats ever suffered by the champions of liberty. If you wish you understand the Third Republic with all the depth of complexity that Shirer intended, reading the whole of this admittedly corpulent history will be well worth the effort. However, with a familiarity with the history of France, reading the prologue and the last 50 pages or so will transport you to Paris in spring of 1940, as the government split and the Petain decided that this time, unlike Verdun, "they shall... pass." While typing my tenth-grade history report at 4 in the morning, last May, I can still remember being moved to the depths of my soul by Shirer's eloquent and tragically beautiful portrayal of the fall of Liberty. If you love France, the war between freedom and oppression, or simply the erudite potency of Shirer's writing, "The Collapse of the Third Republic" is utterly indispensable.